H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Winnie Shaw vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 2-1

Winnie Shaw holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1972 Nottingham Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Winnie Shaw
GBR
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 6-4 6-2 Winnie Shaw Match data Jun 10, 1972* QF Nottingham Open WTA 250 Grass
Winnie Shaw 4-6 6-4 7-5 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jun 5, 1970* R16 Manchester Rothmans WTA 250 Grass
Winnie Shaw 4-6 6-3 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data May 15, 1970* R16 Brussels WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Winnie Shaw — — — 1,995 296 144 67.3% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Winnie Shaw Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 1968 49–28 63.6% — 1,778 0 1 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 1969 69–27 71.9% — 1,905 0 3 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 1970 55–26 67.9% — 1,944 0 6 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 1971 46–26 63.9% — 1,860 0 7 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 1972 32–12 72.7% — 1,909 0 11 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 1973 2–2 50.0% — 1,874 0 12 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 1974 5–3 62.5% — 1,859 0 12 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 1975 10–6 62.5% — 1,820 0 12 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,753 0 12 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 1977 8–2 80.0% — 1,809 0 14 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 1978 12–5 70.6% — 1,792 0 14 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 1979 4–2 66.7% — 1,767 0 14 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Winnie Shaw Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1968 11 8 19 57.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 13 7 20 65.0% 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 1969 15 7 22 68.2% 24 9 33 72.7% 27 10 37 73.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 28 11 39 71.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 21 13 34 61.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1972 4 1 5 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1973 — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1974 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1976 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1978 — — — — — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 45 21 66 68.2% 75 38 113 66.4% 122 57 179 68.2% 43 25 68 63.2% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Winnie Shaw Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 1968 1779 125.2 — — — — +80 -137 -118 60.0% +0.94 14–9 (61%) — — -3.79 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 1969 1906 138.6 — — — — +29 -69 +21 67.3% +1.34 15–8 (65%) — — -3.53 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 1970 1945 150.7 — — — — +34 -93 +134 64.5% +1.34 13–8 (62%) 0–1 — -6.98 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 1971 1861 145.2 — — — — +77 +27 +71 61.1% +0.99 9–8 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 -1.18 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 1972 1909 141.3 — — — — +62 +41 -11 71.3% +1.47 7–2 (78%) 2–1 (67%) 105.0 -0.22 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 1973 1875 118.0 — — — — — — -20 55.6% +1.67 0–1 — — +0.17 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 1974 1860 123.7 — — — — +72 +91 — 58.8% +0.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.45 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 1975 1820 132.4 — — — — +137 +77 +16 65.8% +1.37 1–5 (17%) — — +1.98 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 1976 1753 113.7 — — — — — +99 +83 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–1 — +0.32 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 1977 1810 127.5 — — — — — — +125 70.8% +1.37 3–1 (75%) — — +0.97 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 1978 1792 120.6 — — — — — — +161 65.0% +1.20 4–2 (67%) — — +2.28 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 1979 1767 110.6 — — — — — — — 64.3% +1.22 1–1 — — +0.56 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
Career — 1995 143.0 — — — — +60 -39 +50 64.1% +1.18 68–47 (59%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -2.07 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.