H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 2-1
Winnie Shaw holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1972 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1972* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Pam Teeguarden | 6-4 6-2 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1970* | Manchester Rothmans | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
| May 15, 1970* | Brussels | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,926 | 245 | 296 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Pam Teeguarden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 21–22 | 48.8% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 4 |