H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Patricia Walkden H2H: 2-2
Winnie Shaw and Patricia Walkden are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Patricia Walkden leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1969 Beckenham quarterfinal 9-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1969* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 9-7 6-0 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1969* | Bloemfontein | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Patricia Walkden | 6-1 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1968* | Manchester Indoors | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Winnie Shaw | 8-6 6-2 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1968* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Patricia Walkden | 7-5 7-5 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Patricia Walkden | — | — | — | 1,941 | 218 | 104 | 67.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Patricia Walkden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 48–23 | 67.6% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 53–18 | 74.6% | — | 1,879 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 49–24 | 67.1% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 9–3 | 75.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 31–17 | 64.6% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |