H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Patti Hogan H2H: 3-3
Winnie Shaw and Patti Hogan are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Patti Hogan won the 1970 Manchester quarterfinal 8-10 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1970* | Manchester | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Patti Hogan | 8-10 7-5 6-4 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| May 30, 1970* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1969* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Winnie Shaw | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1969* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1969* | Manchester | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Patti Hogan | 8-6 3-6 9-7 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| May 31, 1969* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 7-5 6-4 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Patti Hogan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |