Winnie Shaw
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | 4 | 16 | 20 | May 25, 1974 | H2H |
| Margaret Court | 0 | 12 | 12 | Jul 2, 1971 | H2H |
| Ann Jones | 3 | 7 | 10 | Jul 30, 1977 | H2H |
| Joyce Williams | 4 | 6 | 10 | Sep 14, 1975 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 3 | 6 | 9 | Jul 15, 1972 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Pixie Lamm H2H: 1-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 1–0 lead over Pixie Lamm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1969 Berkeley quarterfinal 1-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | 1-6 6-2 6-0 | Pixie Lamm | Match data | Oct 5, 1969* | QF | Berkeley | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,995 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| Pixie Lamm | — | — | — | 1,571 | 14 | 13 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Pixie Lamm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,909 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Pixie Lamm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1968 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 1969 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 27 | 10 | 37 | 73.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1970 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 28 | 11 | 39 | 71.8% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 45 | 21 | 66 | 68.2% | 75 | 38 | 113 | 66.4% | 122 | 57 | 179 | 68.2% | 43 | 25 | 68 | 63.2% | — | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Pixie Lamm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1503 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +97 | — | -19 | 51.2% | +0.51 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | +0.49 |
| 21 | 1968 | 1779 | 125.2 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -137 | -118 | 60.0% | +0.94 | 14–9 (61%) | — | — | -3.79 | 1969 | 1544 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | +130 | — | — | 64.3% | +1.07 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.81 |
| 22 | 1969 | 1906 | 138.6 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -69 | +21 | 67.3% | +1.34 | 15–8 (65%) | — | — | -3.53 | 1970 | 1543 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | +131 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.75 | — | — | — | +0.75 |
| 23 | 1970 | 1945 | 150.7 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -93 | +134 | 64.5% | +1.34 | 13–8 (62%) | 0–1 | — | -6.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 1861 | 145.2 | — | — | — | — | +77 | +27 | +71 | 61.1% | +0.99 | 9–8 (53%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -1.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 1909 | 141.3 | — | — | — | — | +62 | +41 | -11 | 71.3% | +1.47 | 7–2 (78%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 1875 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -20 | 55.6% | +1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 1860 | 123.7 | — | — | — | — | +72 | +91 | — | 58.8% | +0.77 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 1820 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | +137 | +77 | +16 | 65.8% | +1.37 | 1–5 (17%) | — | — | +1.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 1753 | 113.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +99 | +83 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 1810 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +125 | 70.8% | +1.37 | 3–1 (75%) | — | — | +0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 1792 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +161 | 65.0% | +1.20 | 4–2 (67%) | — | — | +2.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 1767 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 64.3% | +1.22 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1995 | 143.0 | — | — | — | — | +60 | -39 | +50 | 64.1% | +1.18 | 68–47 (59%) | 9–7 (56%) | 103.1 | -2.07 | — | 1571 | 109.8 | — | — | — | — | +120 | — | -19 | 54.0% | +0.47 | 3–6 (33%) | — | — | +7.59 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Pixie Lamm
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pamela Austin | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 3, 1969 | H2H |
| Ann Lebedeff | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 26, 1969 | H2H |
| Denise Carter | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 26, 1969 | H2H |
| Mary Ann Eisel | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 9, 1968 | H2H |
| Daniele Bouteleux | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 19, 1970 | H2H |