H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Sue Barker H2H: 1-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 1–0 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1970 Torquay fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1970* | Torquay | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-2 | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |