H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Valerie Ziegenfuss H2H: 2-1
Winnie Shaw holds a 2–1 lead over Valerie Ziegenfuss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on carpet, while Valerie Ziegenfuss leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1970 Manchester Rothmans quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 1970* | Manchester Rothmans | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-4 6-2 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1968* | Curacao | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1968* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-4 6-1 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Valerie Ziegenfuss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |