H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Virginia Wade H2H: 4-16
Virginia Wade holds a 16–4 lead over Winnie Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 20 main-draw meetings, Virginia Wade leads 7–0 on carpet and 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Wade won the 1974 Bournemouth quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1974* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-1 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1971* | Billingham | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-4 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1971* | South Orange | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-3 1-6 (ret.) | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1971* | Newport Wales | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Virginia Wade | 4-6 9-7 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1971 | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | BR | Hard | Winnie Shaw | 6-3 6-3 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1971* | Durban | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Virginia Wade | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1970* | Wembley | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 8-6 5-7 6-4 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1970* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-0 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| May 3, 1969* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1969* | Cape Town | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-2 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1969* | Port Elizabeth | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Dec 27, 1968* | East London | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Nov 26, 1968* | London | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1968* | Queen's Indoors | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 8-6 5-7 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1968* | Torquay | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-4 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1968* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-2 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1968* | Manchester Indoors | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Winnie Shaw | 8-10 6-3 6-3 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1968* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-2 6-4 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1968* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-1 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1968* | Chingford | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Virginia Wade | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Virginia Wade | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 |