H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Yanina Wickmayer vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-2

Tamira Paszek holds a 2–0 lead over Yanina Wickmayer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2012 Wimbledon round of 32 2-6 7-6(4) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yanina Wickmayer
Belgium Age 36 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 2-6 7-6(4) 7-5 Yanina Wickmayer #36 Match data Jul 1, 2012* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tamira Paszek 7-6(7) 6-1 Yanina Wickmayer #175 Match data Jan 3, 2008* R32 ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yanina Wickmayer #765 #12 3,320 1,933 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yanina Wickmayer Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2008 10–14 41.7% #73 1,540 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2009 32–16 66.7% #16 1,844 0 2 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2010 31–21 59.6% #23 1,770 0 3 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2011 28–18 60.9% #26 1,772 0 3 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2012 29–26 52.7% #23 1,618 0 3 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2013 17–24 41.5% #51 1,589 0 3 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2014 13–19 40.6% #75 1,556 0 3 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2015 18–17 51.4% #41 1,684 0 4 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2016 19–24 44.2% #58 1,635 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2017 11–14 44.0% #115 1,638 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2018 3–5 37.5% #122 1,644 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2019 2–2 50.0% #152 1,582 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2020 0–1 0.0% #166 1,578 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2022 2–3 40.0% #321 1,561 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2023 8–7 53.3% #71 1,655 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2024 0–3 0.0% #765 1,532 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–3 0.0% — 1,501 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yanina Wickmayer Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2008 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2009 19 11 30 63.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2012 16 15 31 51.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2016 15 15 30 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 141 139 280 50.4% 36 40 76 47.4% 40 34 74 54.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 396/440 of Yanina Wickmayer's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yanina Wickmayer Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 2008 20/24 3.6 4.6 59.0% 66.6% 45.8% 56.1% 42.9% 58.2% 40.4% 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2009 47/48 2.3 4.2 64.9% 65.0% 47.0% 48.0% 51.3% 58.7% 46.6% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2010 49/52 3.2 4.0 65.2% 65.8% 50.0% 55.9% 47.0% 60.1% 44.2% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2011 43/46 2.8 3.4 66.4% 62.9% 45.7% 48.4% 49.9% 56.9% 42.5% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2012 48/55 1.6 3.8 64.8% 60.4% 47.6% 48.1% 50.4% 55.7% 45.3% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2013 36/41 1.6 4.7 62.4% 62.1% 41.6% 53.8% 48.3% 54.4% 40.2% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2014 31/32 1.6 4.5 60.8% 59.2% 43.5% 46.3% 43.7% 52.5% 39.2% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2015 23/35 2.8 4.7 64.6% 63.4% 46.1% 56.5% 41.3% 57.4% 38.2% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2016 35/43 3.9 3.6 62.9% 65.8% 43.4% 43.8% 49.2% 57.4% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 25/25 3.3 3.4 62.7% 65.5% 43.0% 59.3% 40.7% 57.0% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 8/8 1.9 2.3 67.2% 62.1% 44.1% 48.5% 38.3% 56.1% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 4/4 5.8 3.5 61.1% 61.6% 50.3% 60.8% 38.1% 57.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1/1 5.0 3.0 46.9% 69.6% 42.3% 0.0% 0.0% 55.1% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 5/5 1.6 2.6 66.4% 66.2% 34.6% 58.7% 37.6% 55.6% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 15/15 2.6 4.3 64.2% 61.8% 39.4% 55.5% 53.6% 53.7% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 3/3 1.0 4.3 70.9% 61.3% 39.0% 42.9% 30.9% 55.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 3/3 1.0 4.0 65.6% 45.4% 29.2% 30.6% 29.4% 40.1% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 396/440 2.6 4.0 63.9% 63.3% 45.2% 50.9% 46.9% 56.6% 42.3% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yanina Wickmayer Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2008 1541 118.5 +1.10 -2.21 0.965 49.3% -12 — +153 45.6% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 96.9 -0.19 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2009 1845 138.9 +2.89 +2.24 1.129 52.5% -67 -217 -63 63.4% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 108.5 -0.38 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2010 1771 147.6 +3.55 +1.24 1.108 52.1% -25 -73 +42 58.2% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 -0.09 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2011 1772 137.9 +1.53 -0.96 0.987 49.9% -34 -18 +65 58.7% +0.55 13–5 (72%) 6–5 (55%) 109.7 -0.40 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2012 1618 128.3 +0.06 +1.37 1.022 50.5% +42 +98 +183 54.1% +0.12 6–10 (38%) 7–7 (50%) 93.9 +3.14 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2013 1590 122.3 -1.06 -2.39 0.882 47.6% +21 +17 +202 44.3% -0.46 8–9 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 -0.49 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2014 1556 109.0 -2.75 -3.18 0.825 46.0% -10 +67 +179 42.4% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.0 +0.61 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2015 1684 131.2 +0.06 -2.08 0.896 48.0% -6 -86 +30 50.6% +0.10 8–5 (62%) 0–4 (0%) 100.6 -1.93 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2016 1635 130.0 +1.11 -1.54 0.959 49.0% +11 -60 +35 46.6% -0.07 7–10 (41%) 3–10 (23%) 90.8 -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 1638 118.0 +0.72 -2.73 0.903 48.1% +22 -82 +35 43.6% -0.56 3–2 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 101.3 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1644 116.3 -0.80 -1.10 0.921 48.4% +42 — +44 37.5% -0.75 — 0–2 — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1582 105.8 0.00 +0.01 0.938 48.6% — — — 50.0% -0.70 1–1 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1578 101.7 -0.40 +1.21 0.717 42.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1561 112.3 -0.11 +0.15 1.022 50.5% +6 — — 45.5% +0.09 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1655 132.7 -1.00 +0.89 0.957 49.0% 0 — — 56.7% +0.27 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.31 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1533 98.0 -1.89 -3.41 0.914 47.1% -5 — — 25.0% -1.38 0–2 1–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1502 92.0 -2.96 -3.50 0.612 38.4% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1934 133.4 +0.75 -0.56 0.975 49.5% -5 -28 +78 51.3% 0.00 72–75 (49%) 54–60 (47%) 98.9 -0.40 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.