H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yayuk Basuki vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 0-1
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 1–0 lead over Yayuk Basuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1992 Indian Wells third round 7-5 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1992* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Yayuk Basuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yayuk Basuki | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |