H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Yayuk Basuki vs Jo Durie H2H: 1-0

Yayuk Basuki holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yayuk Basuki leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 1991 Birmingham round of 64 4-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yayuk Basuki
INA Age 55 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yayuk Basuki #84 4-6 6-3 6-3 Jo Durie #77 Match data Jun 12, 1991* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yayuk Basuki #262 #19 1,360 1,942 163 126 56.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yayuk Basuki Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #285 1,487 0 0 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 — — — — — — — 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4
20 1991 17–11 60.7% #35 1,673 0 1 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7
21 1992 18–15 54.5% #48 1,725 0 2 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1993 21–15 58.3% #43 1,739 0 4 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9
23 1994 23–12 65.7% #29 1,791 0 6 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9
24 1995 18–12 60.0% #24 1,848 0 6 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 1996 22–17 56.4% #30 1,853 0 6 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9
26 1997 30–22 57.7% #20 1,855 0 6 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1998 11–16 40.7% #56 1,727 0 6 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #241 1,707 0 6 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 2000 3–4 42.9% #256 1,660 0 6 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yayuk Basuki Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 1993 15 10 25 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1994 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 1997 13 8 21 61.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 96 72 168 57.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 43 20 63 68.3% 14 18 32 43.8% — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yayuk Basuki Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47
17 1988 1488 98.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.10 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68
20 1991 1674 135.5 — — — — -35 — +50 57.1% +0.38 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 108.2 +0.13 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98
21 1992 1725 137.9 — — — — -59 -133 +38 54.7% +0.35 4–5 (44%) 1–1 — +1.56 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62
22 1993 1740 135.5 — — — — -21 — +62 60.3% +0.49 3–2 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 102.5 -0.32 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64
23 1994 1791 130.7 — — — — -53 — +70 59.8% +0.30 9–3 (75%) 9–5 (64%) 106.7 +0.83 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18
24 1995 1848 147.4 — — — — -31 — +62 57.4% +0.21 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 105.2 -1.43 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37
25 1996 1853 142.3 — — — — -18 -213 +95 53.7% +0.06 6–4 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -0.81 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56
26 1997 1855 155.2 — — — — -26 -201 +171 56.4% +0.51 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 103.5 -1.76 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72
27 1998 1728 125.9 — — — — +31 -181 +304 45.0% -0.42 5–5 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.30 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26
28 1999 1708 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.03 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38
29 2000 1660 101.9 — — — — +20 — +403 43.8% -0.94 1–1 1–1 — +0.49 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
Career — 1942 146.2 — — — — -28 -192 +125 55.3% +0.21 49–35 (58%) 37–22 (63%) 108.7 -0.31 — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.