H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yayuk Basuki vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 2-1
Yayuk Basuki holds a 2–1 lead over Mariaan De Swardt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yayuk Basuki leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 1994 Surabaya third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1994* | Surabaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 6-4 7-5 | Mariaan De Swardt | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mariaan De Swardt | 6-3 6-4 | Yayuk Basuki | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1994* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 6-1 7-5 | Mariaan De Swardt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yayuk Basuki | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |