H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yayuk Basuki vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-0
Yayuk Basuki holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yayuk Basuki leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 1995 Jakarta quarterfinal 7-5 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1995* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1991* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yayuk Basuki | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |