H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Yayuk Basuki vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 2-2

Yayuk Basuki and Naoko Sawamatsu are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yayuk Basuki leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1998 Hilton Head second round 6-1 1-6 6-1.

INA Age 55 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 1, 1998* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R64 Clay Naoko Sawamatsu #32 6-1 1-6 6-1 Yayuk Basuki #26 Match data
Jan 15, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Yayuk Basuki #30 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Naoko Sawamatsu #39 Match data
Mar 4, 1992* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R64 Hard Naoko Sawamatsu #31 6-3 6-2 Yayuk Basuki #38 Match data
Apr 21, 1991* Pattaya WTA 250 F Hard Yayuk Basuki #178 6-2 6-2 Naoko Sawamatsu #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Yayuk Basuki #262 #19 1,360 1,940 161 123 56.7% 0 1 0 0 5 6
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,971 182 127 58.9% 0 0 0 3 1 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yayuk Basuki Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,478 0 0
17 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1992 23–12 65.7% #24 1,865 0 1
20 1991 17–11 60.7% #35 1,678 0 1 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,855 0 2
21 1992 16–14 53.3% #48 1,700 0 2 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,872 0 3
22 1993 21–15 58.3% #43 1,723 0 4 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,848 0 3
23 1994 23–12 65.7% #29 1,788 0 6 1996 18–16 52.9% #38 1,807 0 3
24 1995 18–12 60.0% #24 1,846 0 6 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,847 0 4
25 1996 22–16 57.9% #30 1,853 0 6 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,720 0 4
26 1997 30–22 57.7% #20 1,854 0 6
27 1998 11–16 40.7% #56 1,727 0 6
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #241 1,707 0 6
29 2000 3–4 42.9% #256 1,660 0 6