H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Yayuk Basuki vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0
Yayuk Basuki holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yayuk Basuki leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 1991 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Yayuk Basuki | 6-4 6-4 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yayuk Basuki | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |