H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yayuk Basuki vs Samantha Smith H2H: 1-1
Yayuk Basuki and Samantha Smith are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Samantha Smith won the 1998 Eastbourne third round 6-4 3-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1998* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Samantha Smith | 6-4 3-3 (ret.) | Yayuk Basuki | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1998* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Yayuk Basuki | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Samantha Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Samantha Smith | #439 | #55 | 504 | 1,617 | 21 | 51 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yayuk Basuki | Samantha Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #127 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #65 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #230 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |