H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yuka Yoshida vs Fang Li H2H: 2-0
Yuka Yoshida holds a 2–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yuka Yoshida leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yuka Yoshida won the 1998 Oklahoma third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1998* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yuka Yoshida | 6-3 6-2 | Fang Li | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1995* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Yuka Yoshida | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yuka Yoshida | #906 | #52 | 476 | 1,625 | 39 | 64 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yuka Yoshida | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #201 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #102 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #70 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #227 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #158 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |