H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yuliya Beygelzimer vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-0
Yuliya Beygelzimer holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yuliya Beygelzimer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yuliya Beygelzimer won the 2015 Pattaya third round 5-7 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 42
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2015* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yuliya Beygelzimer | 5-7 7-6(6) 6-2 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yuliya Beygelzimer | #706 | #83 | 430 | 1,500 | 11 | 40 | 21.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yuliya Beygelzimer | Kimiko Date Krumm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #122 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #226 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #216 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |