H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yvonne Meusburger vs Jill Craybas H2H: 2-0
Yvonne Meusburger holds a 2–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Meusburger leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yvonne Meusburger won the 2010 US Open first round 3-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yvonne Meusburger | 3-6 7-5 6-0 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2008* | Bogota | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Yvonne Meusburger | 6-4 6-4 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne Meusburger | #93 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,706 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yvonne Meusburger | Jill Craybas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #143 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #49 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2014 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |