H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Alycia Moulton H2H: 3-1

Zina Garrison holds a 3–1 lead over Alycia Moulton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on carpet, while Alycia Moulton leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1987 Dallas round of 32 7-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Alycia Moulton
USA Age 65 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #7 7-6 6-0 Alycia Moulton #53 Match data Mar 19, 1987* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Zina Garrison #12 4-6 6-4 7-5 Alycia Moulton #36 Match data Nov 14, 1986* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Zina Garrison 6-4 7-5 Alycia Moulton Match data Sep 30, 1983* R16 Hartford WTA 250 Carpet
Alycia Moulton 5-0 (ret.) Zina Garrison Match data Jun 8, 1983* SF Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zina Garrison — #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15
Alycia Moulton — #18 22 1,918 145 129 52.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Alycia Moulton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,854 0 1 1979 2–3 40.0% — 1,523 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,991 0 1 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,525 0 0
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,013 0 2 1981 12–6 66.7% — 1,646 0 1
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4 1982 17–13 56.7% — 1,765 0 1
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5 1983 37–23 61.7% — 1,850 0 3
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7 1984 19–17 52.8% #19 1,856 0 3
24 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7 1985 20–18 52.6% — 1,743 0 3
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10 1986 24–24 50.0% #34 1,810 0 3
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11 1987 13–17 43.3% #51 1,736 0 3
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,964 0 11 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,735 0 3
28 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 — — — — — — —
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zina Garrison Alycia Moulton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1979 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1980 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 1982 5 6 11 45.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% 1983 11 5 16 68.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0% 1984 8 4 12 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 6 13 53.8%
24 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 1986 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1987 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1% — 53 46 99 53.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 49 36 85 57.6% 22 30 52 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zina Garrison Alycia Moulton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1530 117.5 — — — — +50 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1570 122.6 — — — — +75 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.07 1978 1485 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.01
18 1982 1854 155.2 — — — — -184 -169 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -4.44 1979 1523 115.1 — — — — +77 — — 41.7% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.16
19 1983 1992 154.7 — — — — -125 -109 -51 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.42 1980 1525 108.8 — — — — +9 — — 16.7% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.82
20 1984 2014 157.4 — — — — +14 -97 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 -0.88 1981 1647 135.6 — — — — -21 — — 64.3% +1.24 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.56
21 1985 2034 160.3 — — — — +48 -57 -43 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +0.81 1982 1765 132.6 — — — — -181 -174 -40 56.3% +0.73 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 100.7 -0.14
22 1986 2001 159.4 — — — — +95 -126 -22 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.14 1983 1851 143.0 — — — — -104 -189 +33 59.7% +0.46 6–7 (46%) 10–3 (77%) 104.8 -1.01
23 1987 1989 166.9 — — — — +36 -61 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.84 1984 1857 148.4 — — — — +40 — -63 53.0% +0.42 7–6 (54%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -1.73
24 1988 2044 162.1 — — — — +19 -90 +74 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.42 1985 1744 133.9 — — — — +93 — -48 53.7% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 95.9 +0.67
25 1989 2136 170.0 — — — — +58 -213 -22 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.27 1986 1811 145.6 — — — — +29 -262 -54 48.7% -0.01 10–7 (59%) 6–7 (46%) 102.4 -5.20
26 1990 2042 161.7 — — — — +13 -145 +212 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68 1987 1736 135.3 — — — — +6 — +47 47.1% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 -1.95
27 1991 1964 154.0 — — — — +29 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03 1988 1735 106.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.58
28 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +40 -53 +313 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +23 -216 +200 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1889 145.4 — — — — +24 -186 +260 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1869 147.9 — — — — +28 -240 +310 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1712 111.9 — — — — +24 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2147 164.7 — — — — +27 -112 +90 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.54 — 1919 145.8 — — — — -5 -204 -9 52.9% +0.24 40–42 (49%) 30–32 (48%) 99.8 -4.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.