H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Zina Garrison vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 4-0
Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1985 Houston fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1985* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-1 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1985 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-2 6-2 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1984* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-1 6-1 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1983* | Tampa | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-1 6-1 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Debbie Spence Nasim | — | — | — | 1,837 | 56 | 62 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zina Garrison | Debbie Spence Nasim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |