H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Zina Garrison vs Jana Novotna H2H: 1-2
Jana Novotna holds a 2–1 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jana Novotna leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1993 Virginia Slims Championships fourth round 6-4 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1993 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Jana Novotna | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zina Garrison | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| 30 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |
| 31 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |