H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 5-1

Zina Garrison holds a 5–1 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1991 Sydney third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 1991* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Zina Garrison #10 6-1 6-3 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Jun 16, 1989* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Zina Garrison #5 6-1 5-7 6-1 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Apr 18, 1987* Amelia Island WTA 250 QF Clay Zina Garrison #7 6-4 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Feb 8, 1985* Delray Beach WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 7-5 6-1 Zina Garrison #7 Match data
Feb 3, 1984* Houston WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #9 6-4 6-3 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Aug 5, 1983* Indianapolis WTA 250 SF Clay Zina Garrison 6-1 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — — — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,806 0 2
15 — — — — — — — 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,871 0 2
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,850 0 2
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1986 34–16 68.0% — 1,974 0 4
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,812 0 4
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,789 0 4
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,698 0 4
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,590 0 4
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,629 0 4
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,586 0 4
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,608 0 4
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 — — — — — — —