H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-0

Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 1989* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Zina Garrison #5 6-1 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jun 17, 1989* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Zina Garrison #5 6-3 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 — — — — — — —
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 — — — — — — —
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 — — — — — — —
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8