H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Zina Garrison vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 4-0
Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1989 Chicago final 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1989* | Chicago | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1989* | Oakland | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-1 6-1 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-2 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1985* | Denver | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-4 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zina Garrison | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |