H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Laura Arraya H2H: 4-0

Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1992 Oakland third round 6-4 4-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 1992* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #18 6-4 4-6 7-6 Laura Arraya #43 Match data
Mar 23, 1989* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R32 Hard Zina Garrison #7 6-2 6-1 Laura Arraya #136 Match data
Oct 16, 1986* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #11 6-0 6-1 Laura Arraya #29 Match data
Apr 10, 1986* Hilton Head WTA 250 R32 Clay Zina Garrison #9 6-4 6-3 Laura Arraya #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 1 0 0 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,683 0 4
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,713 0 7
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,760 0 8
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,693 0 8
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 — — — — — — —
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,734 0 10
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,683 0 10
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 — — — — — — —