H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 6-8

Lori Mcneil holds an 8–6 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on carpet, while Lori Mcneil leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1995 Birmingham final 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
6 – 8
14 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #27 6-3 6-3 Lori Mcneil #28 Match data Jun 18, 1995* F Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Lori Mcneil #20 6-2 6-2 Zina Garrison #13 Match data Jun 12, 1994* F Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Zina Garrison #16 6-3 6-1 Lori Mcneil #24 Match data Nov 12, 1993* R16 Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Zina Garrison #19 7-5 6-2 Lori Mcneil #27 Match data Nov 6, 1993* SF Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #23 6-4 2-6 6-3 Zina Garrison #25 Match data Jun 13, 1993* F Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Zina Garrison #16 7-5 3-6 7-6(10) Lori Mcneil #22 Match data Feb 23, 1992* F Oklahoma Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lori Mcneil #22 6-1 6-3 Zina Garrison #14 Match data Feb 15, 1992* QF Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Zina Garrison #4 6-3 6-2 Lori Mcneil #60 Match data Feb 16, 1990* R16 Chicago Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #12 5-7 6-4 6-4 Zina Garrison #9 Match data Feb 5, 1989* SF Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #11 6-2 6-4 Zina Garrison #8 Match data Oct 3, 1987* SF New Orleans WTA 250 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #12 7-6(0) 3-6 7-6(6) Zina Garrison #7 Match data Sep 9, 1987* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lori Mcneil #37 2-6 7-5 6-2 Zina Garrison #12 Match data Sep 21, 1986* F Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Lori Mcneil 4-6 2-2 (ret.) Zina Garrison Match data Aug 16, 1981* F Detroit Ata Chps WTA 250 —
Zina Garrison 6-2 6-1 Lori Mcneil Match data Aug 17, 1980* F Atlanta Ata Chps WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zina Garrison — #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,854 0 1 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,991 0 1 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,013 0 2 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,964 0 11 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zina Garrison Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zina Garrison Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1530 117.5 — — — — +50 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.24 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1981 1570 122.6 — — — — +75 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.07 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1982 1854 155.2 — — — — -184 -169 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -4.44 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1983 1992 154.7 — — — — -125 -109 -51 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.42 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1984 2014 157.4 — — — — +14 -97 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 -0.88 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1985 2034 160.3 — — — — +48 -57 -43 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +0.81 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1986 2001 159.4 — — — — +95 -126 -22 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.14 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1987 1989 166.9 — — — — +36 -61 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.84 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1988 2044 162.1 — — — — +19 -90 +74 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.42 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1989 2136 170.0 — — — — +58 -213 -22 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.27 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 1990 2042 161.7 — — — — +13 -145 +212 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1991 1964 154.0 — — — — +29 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +40 -53 +313 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +23 -216 +200 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.21 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 1994 1889 145.4 — — — — +24 -186 +260 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 1995 1869 147.9 — — — — +28 -240 +310 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 1996 1712 111.9 — — — — +24 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2147 164.7 — — — — +27 -112 +90 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.54 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.