H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Zina Garrison vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 6-8
Lori Mcneil holds a 8–6 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on carpet, while Lori Mcneil leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1995 Birmingham final 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
6
–
8
14 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1995* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-3 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1994* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Lori Mcneil | 6-2 6-2 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1993* | Philadelphia | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-1 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1993* | Oakland | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 7-5 6-2 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1993* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Lori Mcneil | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1992* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Zina Garrison | 7-5 3-6 7-6(10) | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1992* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Lori Mcneil | 6-1 6-3 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Feb 16, 1990* | Chicago | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-2 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1989* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Lori Mcneil | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1987* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Lori Mcneil | 6-2 6-4 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Sep 9, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Lori Mcneil | 7-6(0) 3-6 7-6(6) | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1986* | Tampa | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Lori Mcneil | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1981* | Detroit Ata Chps | WTA 250 | F | — | Lori Mcneil | 4-6 2-2 (ret.) | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1980* | Atlanta Ata Chps | WTA 250 | F | — | Zina Garrison | 6-2 6-1 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,032 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zina Garrison | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,017 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,655 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,669 | 0 | 11 |