H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Zina Garrison vs Louise Field H2H: 0-1
Louise Field holds a 1–0 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Field leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Louise Field won the 1989 Wimbledon second round 1-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Louise Field | 1-6 6-2 7-5 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zina Garrison | Louise Field | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |