H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 2-1

Zina Garrison holds a 2–1 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1988 Chicago fourth round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
Age 65

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 11, 1988* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #9 6-3 6-2 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Feb 13, 1987* San Francisco WTA 250 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #9 6-1 6-1 Mareen Louie Harper Match data
Jan 20, 1985* Denver WTA 250 F Carpet Mareen Louie Harper 6-4 4-6 6-4 Zina Garrison #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,567 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,715 0 0
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,670 0 0
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 2
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,614 0 2
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,577 0 2
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,591 0 2
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,615 0 2
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,546 0 2
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2