H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1991 Wimbledon round of 32 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-3 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data | Jun 30, 1991* | R32 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Zina Garrison | 6-2 6-1 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data | Mar 22, 1989* | R64 | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,146 | 584 | 270 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 15 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,625 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zina Garrison | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #10 | 1,990 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,033 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 2,000 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,988 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #9 | 2,043 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,135 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,041 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,888 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,711 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Zina Garrison | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1988 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1982 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1989 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1983 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1984 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1985 | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 21 | 5 | 26 | 80.8% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1988 | 28 | 10 | 38 | 73.7% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1995 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1989 | 30 | 6 | 36 | 83.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1990 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1997 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1991 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 225 | 86 | 311 | 72.3% | 90 | 58 | 148 | 60.8% | 123 | 41 | 164 | 75.0% | 142 | 83 | 225 | 63.1% | Career | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 14 | 30 | 44 | 31.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Zina Garrison | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1529 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.56 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.25 | 1987 | 1504 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.37 |
| 1981 | 1570 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.55 | 2–2 (50%) | — | — | +1.08 | 1988 | 1578 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -8 | — | 45.5% | -0.15 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.9 | +0.45 |
| 1982 | 1854 | 155.0 | — | — | — | — | -185 | -170 | -50 | 57.5% | +0.46 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–3 (57%) | 108.3 | -5.41 | 1989 | 1612 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -33 | — | 44.3% | -0.85 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 1983 | 1991 | 154.6 | — | — | — | — | -125 | -109 | -50 | 65.0% | +0.87 | 7–2 (78%) | 7–6 (54%) | 108.1 | -2.31 | 1990 | 1589 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -55 | — | 32.7% | -1.00 | 5–3 (63%) | 0–5 (0%) | 99.0 | -0.92 |
| 1984 | 2013 | 157.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -96 | -60 | 65.1% | +1.21 | 12–7 (63%) | 7–2 (78%) | 105.1 | +0.09 | 1991 | 1554 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -34 | +68 | 35.7% | -0.98 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.8 | -0.11 |
| 1985 | 2033 | 160.2 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -57 | -42 | 67.7% | +1.56 | 15–5 (75%) | 4–11 (27%) | 96.5 | +1.14 | 1992 | 1520 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.57 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.32 |
| 1986 | 2001 | 159.2 | — | — | — | — | +95 | -126 | -21 | 66.0% | +1.22 | 10–7 (59%) | 8–6 (57%) | 98.3 | -1.84 | 1993 | 1560 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.82 |
| 1987 | 1988 | 166.8 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -60 | +137 | 69.6% | +1.50 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–4 (60%) | 100.4 | -2.77 | 1994 | 1546 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.30 |
| 1988 | 2043 | 162.0 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -89 | +75 | 68.1% | +1.43 | 9–7 (56%) | 7–3 (70%) | 101.1 | -4.39 | 1995 | 1545 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -11 | +27 | 40.8% | -0.86 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | -0.97 |
| 1989 | 2135 | 170.0 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -212 | -20 | 76.4% | +2.14 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–3 (77%) | 101.5 | -0.28 | 1996 | 1527 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.67 |
| 1990 | 2041 | 161.7 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -144 | +213 | 68.5% | +1.50 | 11–10 (52%) | 4–5 (44%) | 95.8 | -1.68 | 1997 | 1515 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.13 |
| 1991 | 1964 | 153.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -134 | +240 | 63.1% | +0.89 | 9–5 (64%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.7 | +1.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1915 | 157.8 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -53 | +312 | 62.5% | +0.84 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 97.2 | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1996 | 160.6 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -217 | +199 | 67.4% | +1.23 | 8–7 (53%) | 8–4 (67%) | 100.2 | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1889 | 145.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -186 | +259 | 54.3% | +0.13 | 10–4 (71%) | 7–2 (78%) | 102.6 | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1868 | 147.9 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -240 | +311 | 61.2% | +0.83 | 6–10 (38%) | 5–3 (63%) | 91.6 | +1.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1712 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 20.8% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2146 | 164.6 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -112 | +91 | 65.2% | +1.16 | 131–94 (58%) | 86–59 (59%) | 101.4 | -1.56 | Career | 1625 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -29 | +45 | 38.2% | -0.87 | 23–24 (49%) | 6–16 (27%) | 97.8 | -1.28 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 1 | 33 | 34 | Nov 7, 1993 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 8 | 8 | 16 | Jun 12, 1993 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 2 | 12 | 14 | Nov 11, 1995 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 6 | 8 | 14 | Jun 18, 1995 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 10 | 3 | 13 | Nov 14, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 2, 1995 | H2H |
| Silke Meier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Emanuela Zardo | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 20, 1993 | H2H |
| Laurence Courtois | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 13, 1996 | H2H |