H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 4-0

Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1994 Oakland fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 4, 1994* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #18 6-3 6-3 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Mar 14, 1994* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Zina Garrison #16 6-3 6-3 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Nov 3, 1990* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Zina Garrison #8 6-7 6-1 6-2 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Oct 3, 1987* New Orleans WTA 250 QF Carpet Zina Garrison #8 3-6 6-1 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,849 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Zina Garrison Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,542 0 1
1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,588 0 1
1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,593 0 1
1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,746 0 1
1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,740 0 1
1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,772 0 1
1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,780 0 1
1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,663 0 1
1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,672 0 1
1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 — — — — — — —