H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 3-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–3 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1994 Sydney quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 7-5 6-2 Zina Garrison #14 Match data
Nov 11, 1993* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #16 6-4 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #7 Match data
Jun 27, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Zina Garrison #21 6-0 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #6 Match data
Jan 26, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #11 1-6 6-2 8-6 Zina Garrison #4 Match data
Oct 14, 1989* Filderstadt WTA 250 SF Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #13 3-6 6-4 7-5 Zina Garrison #5 Match data
Jun 17, 1988* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #16 6-3 3-6 6-0 Zina Garrison #12 Match data
Apr 10, 1987* Hilton Head WTA 250 R16 Clay Zina Garrison #7 6-1 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 — — — — — — —
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 — — — — — — —