H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-0

Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1991 Key Biscayne round of 64 5-7 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #9 5-7 6-4 7-5 Nana Smith #112 Match data Mar 17, 1991* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Zina Garrison #9 2-6 6-0 6-2 Nana Smith #112 Match data Jan 18, 1991* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zina Garrison Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zina Garrison Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
30 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.