H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Zina Garrison vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-0
Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1991 Key Biscayne second round 5-7 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1991* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zina Garrison | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |