H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 5-0

Zina Garrison holds a 5–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 4–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1990 San Diego fourth round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 1990* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #5 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #54 Match data
Oct 16, 1987* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #8 6-1 6-0 Nathalie Herreman #84 Match data
Oct 10, 1986* Zurich WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #12 6-7 4-0 (ret.) Nathalie Herreman #56 Match data
Nov 9, 1985* Hilversum WTA 250 QF Carpet Zina Garrison #9 6-0 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #126 Match data
Mar 22, 1984* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #8 6-1 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 — — — — — — —