H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 0-1

Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 1–0 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1996 Oakland third round 6-4 6-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 7, 1996* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Patricia Hy Boulais 6-4 6-7 6-4 Zina Garrison #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1