H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 3-0

Zina Garrison holds a 3–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1989 Chicago round of 16 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Pilar Vasquez
PER Age 63 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #5 6-2 6-0 Pilar Vasquez #168 Match data Nov 10, 1989* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Zina Garrison #12 6-1 6-2 Pilar Vasquez #173 Match data Sep 19, 1986* R16 Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Zina Garrison #8 6-0 7-5 Pilar Vasquez #87 Match data Apr 20, 1984* R16 Amelia Island Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15
Pilar Vasquez #772 #66 8 1,799 94 130 42.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Pilar Vasquez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1 1980 15–0 100.0% — 1,695 0 3
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1981 22–11 66.7% — 1,708 0 4
19 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1 1982 11–14 44.0% — 1,623 0 4
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1983 11–14 44.0% — 1,612 0 4
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4 1984 7–17 29.2% #116 1,543 0 4
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5 1985 1–12 7.7% #116 1,438 0 4
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7 1986 2–9 18.2% #149 1,408 0 4
24 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7 1987 8–11 42.1% #151 1,481 0 4
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10 1988 6–12 33.3% #161 1,510 0 4
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11 1989 4–9 30.8% #194 1,497 0 4
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1990 5–10 33.3% #151 1,473 0 4
28 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12 1991 1–10 9.1% #306 1,408 0 4
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 — — — — — — —
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14 1993 1–1 50.0% #292 1,421 0 4
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zina Garrison Pilar Vasquez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 — — — — 15 0 15 100.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
24 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 1988 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1990 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 1991 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1% — 34 59 93 36.6% 37 51 88 42.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zina Garrison Pilar Vasquez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08 1980 1696 133.9 — — — — — +93 — 100.0% +3.97 — 1–0 — +2.78
18 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41 1981 1709 135.2 — — — — -147 +84 — 64.9% +1.14 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.3 -0.42
19 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31 1982 1623 111.1 — — — — -51 +27 — 44.8% -0.50 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.03
20 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09 1983 1612 111.0 — — — — +15 +14 — 44.1% -0.47 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.9 +3.38
21 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14 1984 1544 104.4 — — — — +13 -1 — 35.2% -1.17 1–5 (17%) 4–1 (80%) 98.6 +0.59
22 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84 1985 1438 95.2 — — — — +88 +8 — 20.0% -2.73 0–4 (0%) — — +0.36
23 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77 1986 1408 94.9 — — — — +93 -5 — 25.0% -2.33 0–2 — — +0.42
24 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39 1987 1482 106.8 — — — — +84 -100 — 45.7% -0.30 3–5 (38%) 1–0 — +1.44
25 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28 1988 1510 111.3 — — — — +17 -101 — 39.5% -0.95 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.40
26 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68 1989 1498 108.0 — — — — -7 — — 33.3% -1.07 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.62
27 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03 1990 1474 96.8 — — — — +14 -57 — 36.4% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 +1.73
28 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17 1991 1409 98.9 — — — — +1 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15
29 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25 1993 1422 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.13
31 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56 — 1800 115.2 — — — — +17 +22 — 44.4% -0.47 24–39 (38%) 18–16 (53%) 97.2 +5.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.