H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 2-0

Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1986 Canadian Open round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Regina Marsikova
CZE Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #12 6-1 6-3 Regina Marsikova Match data Aug 7, 1986* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Zina Garrison #9 6-3 6-2 Regina Marsikova Match data Nov 1, 1985* R16 Zurich Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zina Garrison — #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,036 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,854 0 1 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,907 0 8
19 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,991 0 1 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,013 0 2 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,938 0 12
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,902 0 14
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,998 0 15
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7 — — — — — — —
24 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7 — — — — — — —
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10 — — — — — — —
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,764 0 15
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,964 0 11 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,720 0 15
28 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,541 0 15
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zina Garrison Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1% — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zina Garrison Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30
16 1980 1530 117.5 — — — — +50 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.24 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — 0.00
17 1981 1570 122.6 — — — — +75 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.07 1976 1748 142.5 — — — — -178 +62 -175 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.71
18 1982 1854 155.2 — — — — -184 -169 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -4.44 1977 1908 143.3 — — — — -346 +115 -246 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.7 +0.40
19 1983 1992 154.7 — — — — -125 -109 -51 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.42 1978 1953 158.0 — — — — -97 +117 -135 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.6 -6.67
20 1984 2014 157.4 — — — — +14 -97 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 -0.88 1979 1938 147.7 — — — — -80 +153 -92 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.57
21 1985 2034 160.3 — — — — +48 -57 -43 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +0.81 1980 1902 147.9 — — — — -21 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.24
22 1986 2001 159.4 — — — — +95 -126 -22 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.14 1981 1999 159.4 — — — — -116 +183 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -5.46
23 1987 1989 166.9 — — — — +36 -61 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 2044 162.1 — — — — +19 -90 +74 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 2136 170.0 — — — — +58 -213 -22 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1990 2042 161.7 — — — — +13 -145 +212 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68 1985 1765 131.6 — — — — +5 +293 -79 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.24
27 1991 1964 154.0 — — — — +29 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03 1986 1720 127.0 — — — — +3 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.14
28 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +40 -53 +313 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17 1987 1673 129.0 — — — — +35 +91 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.64
29 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +23 -216 +200 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.21 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +86 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61
30 1994 1889 145.4 — — — — +24 -186 +260 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.26
31 1995 1869 147.9 — — — — +28 -240 +310 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1712 111.9 — — — — +24 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2147 164.7 — — — — +27 -112 +90 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.54 — 2036 150.6 — — — — -67 +139 -142 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.