H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 4-0

Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1991 US Open second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Zina Garrison #12 6-1 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #18 Match data
Apr 1, 1990* Houston WTA 250 QF Clay Zina Garrison #6 6-1 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #24 Match data
Nov 2, 1985* Zurich WTA 250 QF Hard Zina Garrison #9 3-6 6-1 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #43 Match data
Nov 3, 1984* Zurich WTA 250 QF Hard Zina Garrison #9 7-6 3-6 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11