H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Silke Meier H2H: 2-0

Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1992 US Open round of 64 6-2 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Silke Meier
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #13 6-2 2-6 6-4 Silke Meier #91 Match data Sep 3, 1992* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Zina Garrison #4 6-4 6-3 Silke Meier #133 Match data Sep 2, 1990* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15
Silke Meier #948 #40 101 1,666 81 141 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Silke Meier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1985 3–3 50.0% #164 1,511 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1 1986 10–10 50.0% #85 1,594 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1987 10–13 43.5% #50 1,591 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1 1988 8–16 33.3% #99 1,589 0 0
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1989 7–14 33.3% #148 1,553 0 0
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4 1990 6–13 31.6% #132 1,529 0 0
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5 1991 4–9 30.8% #138 1,510 0 0
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7 1992 10–13 43.5% #80 1,585 0 0
24 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7 1993 6–16 27.3% #151 1,520 0 0
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10 1994 5–9 35.7% #113 1,527 0 0
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11 1995 10–14 41.7% #91 1,533 0 0
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1996 2–10 16.7% #205 1,488 0 0
28 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12 1997 0–1 0.0% #234 1,482 0 0
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 — — — — — — —
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zina Garrison Silke Meier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1988 0 5 5 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1% — 19 33 52 36.5% 47 76 123 38.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 10 24 34 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zina Garrison Silke Meier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25 1985 1512 104.5 — — — — — — — 46.2% +0.15 1–0 0–1 — +0.25
17 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08 1986 1594 114.1 — — — — +37 -79 — 49.0% +0.08 5–4 (56%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.33
18 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41 1987 1591 118.2 — — — — +67 -85 — 44.4% -0.61 6–4 (60%) 2–0 — +0.51
19 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31 1988 1590 121.7 — — — — -66 +3 — 36.5% -1.14 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.89
20 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09 1989 1553 105.5 — — — — -80 +44 — 38.5% -0.92 4–6 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 96.0 +1.12
21 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14 1990 1529 108.7 — — — — -25 -7 — 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 -0.10
22 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84 1991 1511 102.1 — — — — -36 +2 — 31.3% -1.13 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — +0.55
23 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77 1992 1585 122.9 — — — — -101 +40 — 45.6% -0.18 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +1.05
24 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39 1993 1520 105.5 — — — — -11 +5 — 31.4% -1.53 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 100.0 +0.19
25 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28 1994 1528 101.6 — — — — -51 +33 — 34.5% -1.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.23
26 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68 1995 1534 112.4 — — — — -61 +42 — 42.4% -0.52 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 101.7 +1.06
27 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03 1996 1488 107.5 — — — — +7 -8 — 21.4% -2.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.31
28 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17 1997 1482 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.14
29 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56 — 1667 116.0 — — — — -20 +5 — 38.4% -0.83 41–38 (52%) 15–23 (39%) 102.4 +2.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.