H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Steffi Graf H2H: 2-12

Steffi Graf holds a 12–2 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 8–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1995 Philadelphia semifinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 12
14 main-draw meetings
Steffi Graf
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steffi Graf #1 6-1 6-3 Zina Garrison #30 Match data Nov 11, 1995* SF Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Steffi Graf #1 6-1 6-2 Zina Garrison #12 Match data Sep 6, 1994* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Steffi Graf #2 6-1 6-7 6-4 Zina Garrison #18 Match data Mar 6, 1993* QF Delray Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Steffi Graf #2 6-0 5-7 7-5 Zina Garrison #15 Match data Mar 7, 1992* QF Boca Raton Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Steffi Graf #2 5-7 6-4 6-1 Zina Garrison #11 Match data Oct 28, 1991* F Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Steffi Graf #2 6-1 6-3 Zina Garrison #9 Match data Jul 5, 1991* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Steffi Graf #1 6-4 7-5 Zina Garrison #5 Match data Aug 11, 1990* SF San Diego Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Zina Garrison #5 6-3 3-6 6-4 Steffi Graf #1 Match data Jul 8, 1990* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Steffi Graf #1 6-4 7-5 Zina Garrison #6 Match data Aug 6, 1989* F San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-1 7-5 Zina Garrison #9 Match data Feb 13, 1989 F Washington Open WTA 250 Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-2 6-0 Zina Garrison #9 Match data Sep 30, 1988* SF Seoul Olympics Olympics Hard
Steffi Graf #1 6-0 6-3 Zina Garrison #9 Match data Nov 16, 1987 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Steffi Graf #4 6-2 6-7 6-3 Zina Garrison #9 Match data Feb 15, 1986* QF Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard
Zina Garrison #9 6-7 6-1 6-2 Steffi Graf #21 Match data Apr 20, 1985* QF Amelia Island Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 0 2 13 15
Steffi Graf #3 #1 5,028 2,603 876 110 88.8% 22 1 15 5 32 32 107

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Steffi Graf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,507 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,545 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,748 0 0
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,038 0 0
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,322 0 8
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19
19 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1 1988 73–3 96.1% #1 2,539 5 30
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,588 8 44
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,512 9 54
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,420 10 61
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7 1992 66–7 90.4% #2 2,434 11 69
24 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,506 14 79
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,414 15 86
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,464 18 95
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,475 21 102
28 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,400 21 103
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,305 21 106
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14 1999 34–9 79.1% #3 2,242 22 107
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Zina Garrison Steffi Graf
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 19 6 25 76.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 20 3 23 87.0% 24 1 25 96.0% — — — — 19 2 21 90.5%
18 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 23 1 24 95.8% 32 0 32 100.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 9 0 9 100.0%
19 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1988 39 1 40 97.5% 20 1 21 95.2% 7 0 7 100.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
20 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1989 39 0 39 100.0% 25 2 27 92.6% 7 0 7 100.0% 14 0 14 100.0%
21 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7% 1990 23 1 24 95.8% 20 2 22 90.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0%
22 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% 1991 22 4 26 84.6% 19 2 21 90.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9%
23 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0% 1992 13 2 15 86.7% 25 3 28 89.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 21 2 23 91.3%
24 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 33 2 35 94.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 7 0 7 100.0% 16 2 18 88.9%
25 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 1994 38 2 40 95.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
26 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1995 22 1 23 95.7% 11 0 11 100.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 8 1 9 88.9%
27 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1996 21 1 22 95.5% 14 1 15 93.3% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 2 11 81.8%
28 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 1997 3 1 4 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
29 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 1998 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
30 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 15 5 20 75.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1% — 350 39 389 90.0% 267 32 299 89.3% 84 14 98 85.7% 175 25 200 87.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Zina Garrison Steffi Graf
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1502 99.4 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.64
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1507 121.5 — — — — — +26 — 38.5% -0.62 0–1 — — +0.12
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1546 109.1 — — — — +59 +52 +29 48.1% -0.15 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.35
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1748 139.6 — — — — -68 -81 -28 51.4% +0.26 9–3 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 111.2 -0.41
16 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25 1985 2038 163.0 — — — — -73 -131 -289 69.6% +1.45 9–4 (69%) 10–3 (77%) 110.8 -2.74
17 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08 1986 2322 176.8 — — — — -62 -128 — 80.5% +2.45 17–3 (85%) 6–7 (46%) 110.7 -5.94
18 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41 1987 2505 181.5 — — — — -48 -84 -637 90.8% +3.42 9–0 (100%) 3–3 (50%) 107.5 -4.82
19 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31 1988 2540 181.5 — — — — -7 -92 -528 91.8% +3.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -1.98
20 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09 1989 2588 183.5 — — — — +30 -140 -492 93.4% +3.80 7–2 (78%) 2–2 (50%) 102.4 -1.81
21 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14 1990 2512 178.9 — — — — +89 -52 -324 89.0% +3.13 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 -0.44
22 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84 1991 2420 177.1 — — — — +72 +83 -183 86.8% +3.10 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 92.3 -0.99
23 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77 1992 2435 179.0 — — — — +24 +66 -41 82.0% +2.69 16–5 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 99.7 -1.85
24 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39 1993 2506 183.0 — — — — -28 +45 -107 86.5% +2.91 13–3 (81%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -3.07
25 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28 1994 2415 179.9 — — — — +25 +40 — 86.0% +3.10 7–3 (70%) 3–7 (30%) 93.7 -1.05
26 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68 1995 2465 178.3 — — — — +6 +52 -61 87.4% +2.78 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 -1.58
27 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03 1996 2475 176.2 — — — — -6 +55 +63 89.5% +2.71 6–1 (86%) 8–2 (80%) 104.0 -1.13
28 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17 1997 2400 149.1 — — — — +38 +70 — 75.0% +1.65 4–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — 0.00
29 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22 1998 2305 172.9 — — — — +58 — +169 74.5% +2.06 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 98.2 -1.13
30 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25 1999 2243 171.2 — — — — -5 +219 +171 70.7% +1.82 13–4 (76%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 -2.55
31 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56 — 2604 181.8 — — — — +8 -20 -151 83.0% +2.71 147–45 (77%) 78–58 (57%) 106.9 -3.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.