H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Zina Garrison vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 2-2
Zina Garrison and Stephanie Rehe are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Stephanie Rehe leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1991 Oakland fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1991* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Stephanie Rehe | 6-2 6-3 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| May 25, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Zina Garrison | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1986* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Stephanie Rehe | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1983* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-4 7-6 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zina Garrison | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |