H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Zina Garrison vs Vicki Nelson H2H: 2-1
Zina Garrison holds a 2–1 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vicki Nelson won the 1986 Wichita third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1986* | Wichita | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Vicki Nelson | 6-3 6-2 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1985* | Denver | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Zina Garrison | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1983* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Zina Garrison | 6-2 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Zina Garrison | Vicki Nelson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |