H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Zina Garrison vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 1-1

Zina Garrison and Wiltrud Probst are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on clay, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1995 Eastbourne second round 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Wiltrud Probst
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Zina Garrison #20 6-0 6-1 Wiltrud Probst #114 Match data
May 30, 1990* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Wiltrud Probst #60 6-1 1-6 7-5 Zina Garrison #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15
Wiltrud Probst #794 #31 344 1,757 119 161 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Zina Garrison Wiltrud Probst
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1 1986 4–5 44.4% #135 1,510 0 0
18 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1 1987 9–14 39.1% #99 1,570 0 0
19 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1 1988 13–17 43.3% #80 1,622 0 0
20 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2 1989 11–13 45.8% #90 1,651 0 0
21 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4 1990 19–14 57.6% #40 1,707 0 1
22 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5 1991 9–18 33.3% #126 1,581 0 1
23 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7 1992 16–13 55.2% #40 1,707 0 2
24 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7 1993 10–18 35.7% #105 1,611 0 2
25 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10 1994 11–14 44.0% #69 1,630 0 2
26 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11 1995 7–11 38.9% #146 1,616 0 2
27 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11 1996 1–6 14.3% #113 1,574 0 2
28 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12 1997 7–9 43.8% #84 1,620 0 2
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14 1998 2–9 18.2% #194 1,569 0 2
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15 — — — — — — —