H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Zuzana Ondraskova vs Julia Vakulenko H2H: 0-1
Julia Vakulenko holds a 1–0 lead over Zuzana Ondraskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Vakulenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Vakulenko won the 2004 Canberra fourth round 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2004* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julia Vakulenko | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | Zuzana Ondraskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zuzana Ondraskova | #1,140 | #74 | 811 | 1,595 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Vakulenko | #979 | #31 | 916 | 1,730 | 51 | 76 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zuzana Ondraskova | Julia Vakulenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #132 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #132 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #130 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #88 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #354 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #156 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #83 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #438 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |