H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Zuzana Ondraskova vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 0-1
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 1–0 lead over Zuzana Ondraskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 2004 Miami first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2004* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-4 6-4 | Zuzana Ondraskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zuzana Ondraskova | #1,140 | #74 | 811 | 1,595 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Zuzana Ondraskova | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #88 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2005 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2006 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #83 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2011 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #438 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |