H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Adrian Mannarino vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 0-3
Bernard Tomic holds a 3–0 lead over Adrian Mannarino in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernard Tomic leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2016 Acapulco fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2016* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-4 6-4 | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2015* | Bogota | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2015* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Mannarino | #49 | #17 | 1,975 | 1,966 | 317 | 370 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adrian Mannarino | Bernard Tomic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #87 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #192 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2014 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2015 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2016 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #60 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #43 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #35 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #69 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #49 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |