H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Adrian Mannarino vs Daniel Evans H2H: 1-3
Daniel Evans holds a 3–1 lead over Adrian Mannarino in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniel Evans leads 2–1 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2022 Eastbourne third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2022* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Daniel Evans | 6-4 6-3 | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2021* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Daniel Evans | 6-4 7-6(7) | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 6-4 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2018* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Adrian Mannarino | 6-4 0-6 7-5 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Mannarino | #49 | #17 | 1,975 | 1,966 | 317 | 370 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adrian Mannarino | Daniel Evans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #87 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #192 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #60 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #43 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #35 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2022 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2023 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2024 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #69 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #49 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |