H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Adrian Mannarino vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 0-1
Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Mannarino in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2011 Stockholm third round 7-6(5) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2011* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Mannarino | #49 | #17 | 1,975 | 1,966 | 317 | 370 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Adrian Mannarino | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #87 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #192 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #60 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #43 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #35 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #69 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #49 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |