H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Adrian Mannarino vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 3-1

Adrian Mannarino holds a 3–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Adrian Mannarino leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Adrian Mannarino won the 2017 Moscow round of 16 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Adrian Mannarino
France Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Adrian Mannarino #29 6-3 7-6(4) Lukas Rosol #204 Match data Oct 20, 2017* R16 Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Adrian Mannarino #60 4-6 6-3 6-4 Lukas Rosol #50 Match data Mar 12, 2016* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lukas Rosol #96 6-2 6-2 Adrian Mannarino #125 Match data Feb 29, 2012* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Adrian Mannarino #86 6-2 7-6(5) Lukas Rosol #78 Match data Oct 28, 2011* R16 St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Adrian Mannarino #67 #17 1,975 1,962 320 376 46.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Adrian Mannarino Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2008 3–3 50.0% #134 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 0–4 0.0% #179 1,550 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #83 1,681 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2011 17–23 42.5% #87 1,714 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2012 1–7 12.5% #192 1,597 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #59 1,702 0 0 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2014 16–23 41.0% #44 1,753 0 0 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2015 28–30 48.3% #47 1,786 0 0 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2016 26–28 48.1% #60 1,765 0 0 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2017 33–27 55.0% #28 1,944 0 0 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2018 25–29 46.3% #42 1,791 0 0 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 2019 27–26 50.9% #43 1,841 0 1 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 2020 14–17 45.2% #35 1,823 0 1 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 2021 13–25 34.2% #71 1,713 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 2022 26–26 50.0% #46 1,747 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
35 2023 39–23 62.9% #22 1,907 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2024 14–28 33.3% #66 1,686 0 5 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2
37 2025 13–15 46.4% #69 1,750 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2026 13–23 36.1% #67 1,679 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Adrian Mannarino Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2008 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
26 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2015 21 20 41 51.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2016 14 18 32 43.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2017 23 18 41 56.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2018 15 18 33 45.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2019 19 19 38 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2020 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2021 9 14 23 39.1% 0 7 7 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2022 21 19 40 52.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2023 26 15 41 63.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 13 19 32 40.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2025 9 12 21 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 8 12 20 40.0% 0 7 7 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 251 476 47.3% 17 68 85 20.0% 78 57 135 57.8% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 693/698 of Adrian Mannarino's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Adrian Mannarino Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2008 6/6 3.7 2.3 59.6% 68.7% 50.5% 49.0% 52.4% 61.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 4/4 5.5 4.0 52.6% 61.7% 38.2% 54.3% 15.6% 50.3% 29.4% 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2010 6/6 6.7 2.8 60.4% 64.8% 47.8% 46.3% 31.7% 58.0% 32.6% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2011 40/40 3.3 2.6 59.3% 67.4% 49.5% 54.5% 41.6% 60.1% 35.2% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2012 8/8 3.6 2.6 57.9% 66.3% 42.2% 43.3% 37.3% 56.1% 30.4% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2013 25/25 5.6 2.5 60.9% 71.3% 48.6% 67.5% 45.4% 63.0% 32.6% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2014 39/39 4.9 2.6 63.0% 67.9% 51.6% 53.6% 48.0% 61.9% 37.5% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2015 57/58 4.4 2.5 61.1% 71.0% 53.0% 59.5% 41.8% 63.9% 37.3% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2016 54/54 4.9 3.1 59.9% 70.8% 48.4% 55.1% 43.8% 62.1% 37.1% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2017 60/60 4.1 2.4 59.9% 68.1% 52.1% 55.0% 48.5% 61.5% 38.3% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2018 54/54 4.7 2.7 63.4% 69.9% 50.3% 57.5% 50.7% 62.7% 35.2% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 2019 53/53 5.3 2.2 59.8% 71.4% 53.3% 53.6% 46.0% 63.9% 37.9% 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 2020 31/31 5.1 2.9 58.1% 71.0% 51.8% 60.5% 45.5% 62.8% 38.5% 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 2021 38/38 3.9 2.7 57.7% 69.4% 48.8% 55.0% 32.9% 60.6% 32.6% 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 2022 52/52 5.4 2.2 60.8% 71.0% 55.2% 52.0% 38.7% 64.7% 36.1% 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
35 2023 62/62 4.9 2.3 60.5% 71.2% 52.8% 55.8% 50.5% 63.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 41/42 4.7 2.5 58.5% 67.1% 50.3% 54.7% 36.2% 60.2% 33.2% 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
37 2025 27/28 5.5 2.0 58.3% 73.1% 53.3% 62.4% 43.6% 64.6% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 36/38 4.3 2.2 62.3% 68.6% 47.5% 54.3% 41.8% 61.1% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 693/698 4.7 2.5 60.3% 69.8% 51.1% 55.9% 43.8% 62.3% 36.1% — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Adrian Mannarino Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1496 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1560 121.8 -1.26 -0.70 0.890 48.0% +55 — — 46.2% -0.69 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1550 106.4 -2.79 -0.59 0.593 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.64 — 0–1 — -0.18 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2010 1681 119.2 -2.84 -2.03 0.777 45.3% +10 — — 33.3% -1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.34 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2011 1715 137.3 -1.91 -1.36 0.882 48.0% -6 -171 +13 42.9% -0.82 5–8 (38%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.03 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2012 1598 117.8 -3.34 -2.70 0.691 43.6% +45 — — 17.6% -2.18 — 0–1 — -0.01 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2013 1703 136.2 -1.12 -1.60 0.881 47.8% -13 — +68 42.4% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.61 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09
26 2014 1753 138.1 -2.02 +0.94 0.985 49.8% -14 -256 +21 46.7% -0.06 4–10 (29%) 3–10 (23%) — +0.46 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04
27 2015 1787 145.8 -0.61 +1.36 1.033 50.4% +7 -263 +26 50.7% +0.04 8–12 (40%) 12–15 (44%) — +3.35 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39
28 2016 1766 149.1 -1.74 +1.15 0.978 49.6% -7 -167 +130 46.3% -0.11 12–8 (60%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.58 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09
29 2017 1944 153.9 -1.59 +2.46 0.996 50.0% -60 -254 -2 51.0% +0.27 14–7 (67%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.98 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23
30 2018 1792 142.1 -0.96 -0.32 0.944 49.1% -35 -157 +181 47.4% -0.48 7–11 (39%) 15–6 (71%) — +1.61 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96
31 2019 1841 147.0 -0.10 +1.98 1.049 50.9% -34 -197 +106 48.0% +0.16 9–6 (60%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.29 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 2020 1823 153.2 +0.01 +1.72 1.036 50.5% +20 -215 — 47.6% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.04 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 2021 1714 136.0 -1.86 -3.18 0.828 46.8% +64 -203 +218 37.2% -0.95 4–3 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.16 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37
34 2022 1747 145.5 +0.78 +0.60 1.023 49.9% +30 -297 +126 48.9% -0.11 8–8 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -1.32 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 2023 1908 145.2 +0.08 +1.95 1.046 50.8% 0 -504 +70 57.2% +0.41 12–5 (71%) 15–16 (48%) — +2.15 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1687 135.7 -3.17 -1.60 0.835 46.8% +55 -306 +131 36.3% -0.90 9–10 (47%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.99 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 2025 1751 137.3 +0.37 +0.87 1.020 50.2% -14 — +112 47.1% 0.00 1–3 (25%) 5–10 (33%) — -1.46 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1679 125.9 -2.57 -1.15 0.864 47.6% +34 -361 +137 36.0% -0.91 7–4 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1963 146.9 -1.10 +0.40 0.958 49.2% +1 -248 +94 45.9% -0.26 109–108 (50%) 133–164 (45%) 95.9 +1.03 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.