H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Adrian Mannarino vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-1

Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Mannarino in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2013 Wimbledon fourth round 4-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Adrian Mannarino
France Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukasz Kubot
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Adrian Mannarino #99 7-5 6-4 Lukasz Kubot #78 Match data May 11, 2014 Q1 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Lukasz Kubot #130 4-6 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4 Adrian Mannarino #111 Match data Jul 2, 2013* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Adrian Mannarino #67 #17 1,975 1,962 320 377 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Adrian Mannarino Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2008 3–3 50.0% #134 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 0–4 0.0% #179 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #83 1,681 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
23 2011 17–23 42.5% #87 1,714 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
24 2012 1–7 12.5% #192 1,597 0 0 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #59 1,702 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0
26 2014 16–23 41.0% #44 1,753 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 28–30 48.3% #47 1,786 0 0 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
28 2016 26–28 48.1% #60 1,765 0 0 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0
29 2017 33–27 55.0% #28 1,944 0 0 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
30 2018 25–29 46.3% #42 1,791 0 0 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0
31 2019 27–26 50.9% #43 1,841 0 1 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0
32 2020 14–17 45.2% #35 1,823 0 1 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0
33 2021 13–25 34.2% #71 1,713 0 1 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0
34 2022 26–26 50.0% #46 1,747 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 39–23 62.9% #22 1,907 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2024 14–28 33.3% #66 1,686 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2025 13–15 46.4% #69 1,750 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2026 13–24 35.1% #67 1,668 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Adrian Mannarino Lukasz Kubot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2008 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 21 20 41 51.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 14 18 32 43.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2017 23 18 41 56.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2018 15 18 33 45.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
31 2019 19 19 38 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2020 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 2021 9 14 23 39.1% 0 7 7 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 21 19 40 52.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 26 15 41 63.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 13 19 32 40.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 9 12 21 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 8 13 21 38.1% 0 7 7 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225 252 477 47.2% 17 68 85 20.0% 78 57 135 57.8% — — — — — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 694/698 of Adrian Mannarino's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Adrian Mannarino Lukasz Kubot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2008 6/6 3.7 2.3 59.6% 68.7% 50.5% 49.0% 52.4% 61.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 4/4 5.5 4.0 52.6% 61.7% 38.2% 54.3% 15.6% 50.3% 29.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 6/6 6.7 2.8 60.4% 64.8% 47.8% 46.3% 31.7% 58.0% 32.6% 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0%
23 2011 40/40 3.3 2.6 59.3% 67.4% 49.5% 54.5% 41.6% 60.1% 35.2% 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5%
24 2012 8/8 3.6 2.6 57.9% 66.3% 42.2% 43.3% 37.3% 56.1% 30.4% 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8%
25 2013 25/25 5.6 2.5 60.9% 71.3% 48.6% 67.5% 45.4% 63.0% 32.6% 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3%
26 2014 39/39 4.9 2.6 63.0% 67.9% 51.6% 53.6% 48.0% 61.9% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 57/58 4.4 2.5 61.1% 71.0% 53.0% 59.5% 41.8% 63.9% 37.3% 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1%
28 2016 54/54 4.9 3.1 59.9% 70.8% 48.4% 55.1% 43.8% 62.1% 37.1% 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0%
29 2017 60/60 4.1 2.4 59.9% 68.1% 52.1% 55.0% 48.5% 61.5% 38.3% 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0%
30 2018 54/54 4.7 2.7 63.4% 69.9% 50.3% 57.5% 50.7% 62.7% 35.2% 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0%
31 2019 53/53 5.3 2.2 59.8% 71.4% 53.3% 53.6% 46.0% 63.9% 37.9% 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1%
32 2020 31/31 5.1 2.9 58.1% 71.0% 51.8% 60.5% 45.5% 62.8% 38.5% 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4%
33 2021 38/38 3.9 2.7 57.7% 69.4% 48.8% 55.0% 32.9% 60.6% 32.6% 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7%
34 2022 52/52 5.4 2.2 60.8% 71.0% 55.2% 52.0% 38.7% 64.7% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 62/62 4.9 2.3 60.5% 71.2% 52.8% 55.8% 50.5% 63.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 41/42 4.7 2.5 58.5% 67.1% 50.3% 54.7% 36.2% 60.2% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 27/28 5.5 2.0 58.3% 73.1% 53.3% 62.4% 43.6% 64.6% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 37/38 4.2 2.2 62.1% 68.1% 47.5% 54.4% 40.7% 60.8% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 694/698 4.7 2.5 60.3% 69.8% 51.1% 55.9% 43.7% 62.3% 36.0% — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Adrian Mannarino Lukasz Kubot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1496 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1560 121.8 -1.26 -0.70 0.890 48.0% +55 — — 46.2% -0.69 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1550 106.4 -2.79 -0.59 0.593 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.64 — 0–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1681 119.2 -2.84 -2.03 0.777 45.3% +10 — — 33.3% -1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.34 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09
23 2011 1715 137.3 -1.91 -1.36 0.882 48.0% -6 -171 +13 42.9% -0.82 5–8 (38%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.03 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
24 2012 1598 117.8 -3.34 -2.70 0.691 43.6% +45 — — 17.6% -2.18 — 0–1 — -0.01 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02
25 2013 1703 136.2 -1.12 -1.60 0.881 47.8% -13 — +68 42.4% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.61 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2014 1753 138.1 -2.02 +0.94 0.985 49.8% -14 -256 +21 46.7% -0.06 4–10 (29%) 3–10 (23%) — +0.46 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1787 145.8 -0.61 +1.36 1.033 50.4% +7 -263 +26 50.7% +0.04 8–12 (40%) 12–15 (44%) — +3.35 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.34
28 2016 1766 149.1 -1.74 +1.15 0.978 49.6% -7 -167 +130 46.3% -0.11 12–8 (60%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.58 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) — +0.09
29 2017 1944 153.9 -1.59 +2.46 0.996 50.0% -60 -254 -2 51.0% +0.27 14–7 (67%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.98 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.47
30 2018 1792 142.1 -0.96 -0.32 0.944 49.1% -35 -157 +181 47.4% -0.48 7–11 (39%) 15–6 (71%) — +1.61 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.63
31 2019 1841 147.0 -0.10 +1.98 1.049 50.9% -34 -197 +106 48.0% +0.16 9–6 (60%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.29 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.16
32 2020 1823 153.2 +0.01 +1.72 1.036 50.5% +20 -215 — 47.6% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.04 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.27
33 2021 1714 136.0 -1.86 -3.18 0.828 46.8% +64 -203 +218 37.2% -0.95 4–3 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.16 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
34 2022 1747 145.5 +0.78 +0.60 1.023 49.9% +30 -297 +126 48.9% -0.11 8–8 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -1.32 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1908 145.2 +0.08 +1.95 1.046 50.8% 0 -504 +70 57.2% +0.41 12–5 (71%) 15–16 (48%) — +2.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1687 135.7 -3.17 -1.60 0.835 46.8% +55 -306 +131 36.3% -0.90 9–10 (47%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1751 137.3 +0.37 +0.87 1.020 50.2% -14 — +112 47.1% 0.00 1–3 (25%) 5–10 (33%) — -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1668 126.2 -2.78 -1.40 0.850 47.2% +33 -351 +148 34.8% -1.02 7–4 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1963 146.9 -1.12 +0.39 0.957 49.2% +1 -247 +95 45.8% -0.27 109–108 (50%) 133–164 (45%) 95.9 +1.01 — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.