H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 10:34 UTC

Adrian Mannarino vs Marin Cilic H2H: 1-3

Marin Cilic holds a 3–1 lead over Adrian Mannarino in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2026 Bank of China Hong Kong Tennis Open third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Adrian Mannarino
France Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2026* Bank of China Hong Kong Tennis Open ATP 250 R32 Hard Marin Cilic #70 6-3 6-2 Adrian Mannarino #68 Match data
Jul 3, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Marin Cilic #18 7-6(6) 7-6(4) 6-3 Adrian Mannarino #42 Match data
Oct 7, 2017* Tokyo ATP 500 SF Hard Adrian Mannarino #31 6-7(5) 6-4 6-0 Marin Cilic #5 Match data
Jun 18, 2015* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Marin Cilic #9 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 Adrian Mannarino #32 Match data
May 28, 2007 Roland Garros Grand Slam Q1 Q Clay Marin Cilic #113 6-2 6-3 Adrian Mannarino #456 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Adrian Mannarino #49 #17 1,975 1,966 317 370 46.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Marin Cilic #88 #3 5,155 2,195 572 344 62.4% 1 1 0 2 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Adrian Mannarino Marin Cilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,499 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 36–23 61.0% #23 1,904 0 1
20 2008 3–3 50.0% #134 1,559 0 0 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,989 0 3
21 2009 0–4 0.0% #179 1,550 0 0 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,854 0 5
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #83 1,681 0 0 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,963 0 6
23 2011 17–23 42.5% #87 1,713 0 0 2012 37–17 68.5% #15 2,009 0 8
24 2012 1–7 12.5% #192 1,597 0 0 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 1,964 0 9
25 2013 10–15 40.0% #59 1,703 0 0 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,127 1 13
26 2014 15–22 40.5% #44 1,749 0 0 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,061 1 14
27 2015 28–30 48.3% #47 1,775 0 0 2016 42–20 67.7% #6 2,133 1 16
28 2016 26–28 48.1% #60 1,766 0 0 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17
29 2017 33–27 55.0% #28 1,945 0 0 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,056 1 18
30 2018 25–29 46.3% #42 1,791 0 0 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,911 1 18
31 2019 27–26 50.9% #43 1,841 0 1 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,850 1 18
32 2020 14–17 45.2% #35 1,823 0 1 2021 31–18 63.3% #30 1,933 1 20
33 2021 13–25 34.2% #71 1,713 0 1 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,958 1 20
34 2022 26–26 50.0% #46 1,746 0 2 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,912 1 20
35 2023 39–23 62.9% #22 1,907 0 5 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,816 1 21
36 2024 14–28 33.3% #66 1,687 0 5 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,819 1 21
37 2025 13–14 48.1% #69 1,766 0 5 2026 13–14 48.1% #88 1,758 1 21
38 2026 11–19 36.7% #49 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —